Should you approve this contract?

Should you approve this contract? Everything in quick, plus static analysis of the bytecode: privileged functions (mint, pause, blacklist, arbitrary withdrawal), proxy and upgradeability detection, dangerous opcodes, DeFi protocol classification and source-verification status.

Paid test badge: not yet. The checks above are free: we call the tool without paying and read the payment request it sends back. The Verified badge needs paid calls whose answers match the promised output, and nobody can buy a badge.

Endpoint

GET https://trust-agent.io/v1/verify/deep

Our checks, last 30 days

We never call tools that send, buy, move money or file anything, not even without paying.

Example input (from the provider)

{
  "method": "GET",
  "queryParams": {
    "address": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",
    "chain": "base",
    "type": "contract"
  },
  "type": "http"
}

Promised output schema (from the provider)

{
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "properties": {
    "input": {
      "additionalProperties": false,
      "properties": {
        "method": {
          "enum": [
            "GET"
          ],
          "type": "string"
        },
        "queryParams": {
          "properties": {
            "address": {
              "description": "REQUIRED. Contract address to analyse.",
              "type": "string"
            },
            "chain": {
              "description": "OPTIONAL. Only \"base\" is served; any other value is refused rather than answered from the wrong chain. Defaults to base.",
              "type": "string"
            },
            "type": {
              "description": "OPTIONAL. contract | defi_protocol.",
              "type": "string"
            }
          },
          "required": [
            "address"
          ],
          "type": "object"
        },
        "type": {
          "const": "http",
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "type",
        "method"
      ],
      "type": "object"
    },
    "output": {
      "properties": {
        "example": {
          "properties": {
            "components": {
              "description": "per-rule scoring breakdown; the score is reconstructable from these plus overrides"
            },
            "confidence": {
              "description": "0-1, how much evidence backs the score"
            },
            "contract": {
              "description": "bytecode analysis: opcodes, proxy kind, privileged functions, interfaces, protocol class, safetyScore"
            },
            "flags": {
              "description": "includes contract-specific findings"
            },
            "overrides": {
              "description": "hard caps applied after weighting, each with from/cap/reason"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "description": "proceed | proceed_with_caution | hold | block | insufficient_data. insufficient_data means no judgment was possible \u2014 treat it as unknown, not as risky."
            },
            "riskBand": {
              "description": "minimal | low | moderate | elevated | severe | unknown"
            },
            "trustScore": {
              "description": "0-100, higher is safer; null when no rule could be evaluated"
            }
          },
          "type": "object"
        },
        "type": {
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "type"
      ],
      "type": "object"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "input"
  ],
  "type": "object"
}

This page as JSON