Token rug check on 70+ chains
Token rug check on 70+ chains - Solana authorities, EVM honeypot, tax, owner and verified-source checks, creator history, sanctions and native controls, with a verdict.
Answers HTTP 400 without x402 payment termsour last check, 2026-10-21
0 of 1checks answered this week
n/amedian answer time
$0.01listed price per call
n/aprice it asked us
Paid test badge: not yet. The checks above are free: we call the tool without paying and read the payment request it sends back. The Verified badge needs paid calls whose answers match the promised output, and nobody can buy a badge.
Endpoint
GET https://saylorinnovations.com/api/security/:solana_address
| Category | Company and compliance |
|---|---|
| Provider host | saylorinnovations.com |
| Networks | eip155:137, eip155:42161, eip155:8453, solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp |
| Payment schemes | exact |
| Self-reported calls, 30 days | 1 from 1 payers (the provider's figure, not ours) |
Our checks, last 30 days
| Day | Result | HTTP | Asked | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 | no x402 terms | 400 | 275 ms |
Example input (from the provider)
{
"method": "GET",
"pathParams": {
"solana_address": "Solana wallet address (base58-encoded public key, 43\u201344 characters)"
},
"type": "http"
}
Promised output schema (from the provider)
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"properties": {
"input": {
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"method": {
"enum": [
"GET"
],
"type": "string"
},
"type": {
"const": "http",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"type",
"method"
],
"type": "object"
},
"output": {
"properties": {
"example": {
"properties": {
"alternatives": {
"description": "Other chains where the same address has pools.",
"items": {
"type": "object"
},
"type": [
"array",
"null"
]
},
"analysis": {
"description": "flags[] with severity and evidence, critical_count, high_count, and a price_impact_estimate for sells of 100 to 100000 USD.",
"type": [
"object",
"null"
]
},
"chain": {
"description": "Chain the address was resolved to, for example solana, base, bsc, tron or sui.",
"type": [
"string",
"null"
]
},
"chain_name": {
"description": "Chain name",
"type": [
"string",
"null"
]
},
"coverage": {
"description": "Which data was actually read: market, security (full, partial, none), holders, and a 0-1 confidence.",
"type": [
"object",
"null"
]
},
"fetched_at": {
"description": "Time the data was fetched from the source (UTC)",
"type": [
"number",
"null"
]
},
"holder_count": {
"description": "Number of holder",
"type": [
"number",
"null"
]
},
"intel": {
"description": "Chain-native facts read from the chain itself, independent of any scanner. Shape depends on the chain: EVM adds verified_source, privileged_functions, creator, deployer, liquidity_lock, depth (quoted Uniswap V3 price impact at $100-$100k), oracle_check and sanctions; Solana adds authorities, Token-2022 extensions, transfer_fee and top token accounts; Tron/Sui/Aptos/TON/XRPL/Hedera/Stellar/Algorand/NEAR/Cosmos add that chain's own token controls (who can mint, freeze, claw back, pause or upgrade).",
"type": [
"object",
"null"
]
},
"intel_flags": {
"description": "Flags raised from the native facts; they are also merged into analysis.flags.",
"items": {
"type": "object"
},
"type": [
"array",
"null"
]
},
"intel_sources": {
"description": "Which native sources answered (ok) and which did not (failed).",
"type": [
"object",
"null"
]
},
"mint": {
"description": "Solana token mint address",
"type": [
"string",
"null"
]
},
"name": {
"description": "Name",
"type": [
"string",
"null"
]
},
"onchain": {
"description": "EVM only: facts read directly from the contract (owner, renounced, proxy, bytecode capabilities).",
"type": [
"object",
"null"
]
},
"security": {
"description": "Security assessment details",
"properties": {
"freeze_authority_revoked": {
"description": "False means your balance can be frozen.",
"type": [
"boolean",
"null"
]
},
"insider_accounts_detected": {
"description": "Total accounts across all detected clusters.",
"type": [
"number",
"null"
]
},
"insider_accounts_pct_of_holders": {
"description": "insider_accounts_detected as a percent of total_holders. A lead to investigate, not a verdict \u2014 legitimate exchanges/market makers can also show up as large connected clusters.",
"type": [
"number",
"null"
]
},
"insider_network_count": {
"description": "Number of connected-wallet clusters RugCheck's graph analysis detected across ALL holders (not just the top 10/20).",
"type": [
"number",
"null"
]
},
"lp_locked_pct": {
"description": "Percent of liquidity locked, 0-100.",
"type": [
"number",
"null"
]
},
"lp_unlock_date": {
"description": "ISO timestamp of the nearest future LP unlock, if any locked LP has a known unlock date. Null if fully unlocked or no lock data.",
"type": [
"string",
"null"
]
},
"mint_authority_revoked": {
"description": "False means new supply can still be minted.",