Is this email address worth sending to?
Is this email address worth sending to? Syntax, domain DNS (MX, then A/AAAA), disposable/role/free-provider lists, a typo suggestion (gmial.com -> gmail.com), a normalized form and a risk verdict with reasons. No SMTP probe: it vouches for the domain, never the mailbox. An invalid address is a paid verdict; a DNS failure is 502, not charged. Pay-per-call via x402. An empty body is answered for the published example address (name@example.com); send {"email":"…"} for any other address.
Paid test badge: not yet. The checks above are free: we call the tool without paying and read the payment request it sends back. The Verified badge needs paid calls whose answers match the promised output, and nobody can buy a badge.
Endpoint
GET https://fiatdock.com/v1/email/check
| Category | Everything else |
|---|---|
| Provider host | fiatdock.com |
| Networks | eip155:8453 |
| Payment schemes | exact |
| Self-reported calls, 30 days | 5 from 2 payers (the provider's figure, not ours) |
Our checks, last 30 days
We never call tools that send, buy, move money or file anything, not even without paying.
Example input (from the provider)
{
"method": "GET",
"queryParams": {
"email": "name@example.com"
},
"type": "http"
}
Promised output schema (from the provider)
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"properties": {
"input": {
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"method": {
"enum": [
"GET"
],
"type": "string"
},
"queryParams": {
"properties": {
"email": {
"description": "The email address to check",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [],
"type": "object"
},
"type": {
"const": "http",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"type",
"method"
],
"type": "object"
},
"output": {
"properties": {
"example": {
"type": "object"
},
"type": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"type"
],
"type": "object"
}
},
"required": [
"input"
],
"type": "object"
}