Spend Cap Review
Spend Cap Review: Do Cost Limits Really Stop? — Reviews pasted code and configuration that spends money (paid AI or API calls, purchases, paid lookups, anything billed per use) and checks whether the limit on that spending really stands in the way of the spending. It flags a cap that sits beside the path instead of on it (a gateway limit while a script calls the provider directly, a counter only in the browser), a missing setting that means no limit, an alert or a budget email used as the prote…
Paid test badge: not yet. The checks above are free: we call the tool without paying and read the payment request it sends back. The Verified badge needs paid calls whose answers match the promised output, and nobody can buy a badge.
Endpoint
GET https://api.aiskills402.com/v1/skills/spend-guard-review/file
| Category | Code and developer |
|---|---|
| Provider host | api.aiskills402.com |
| Networks | eip155:8453 |
| Payment schemes | exact |
| Self-reported calls, 30 days | 2 from 2 payers (the provider's figure, not ours) |
Our checks, last 30 days
We never call tools that send, buy, move money or file anything, not even without paying.
Example input (from the provider)
{
"method": "GET",
"type": "http"
}
Promised output schema (from the provider)
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"properties": {
"input": {
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"headers": {
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "string"
},
"type": "object"
},
"method": {
"enum": [
"GET",
"HEAD"
],
"type": "string"
},
"type": {
"const": "http",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"type",
"method"
],
"type": "object"
},
"output": {
"properties": {
"example": {
"type": "object"
},
"type": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"type"
],
"type": "object"
}
},
"required": [
"input"
],
"type": "object"
}